Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Promenade Eviction Risk: Lower , Richfield

Tract 27053024200 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,182 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

For landlords sizing up the Promenade area of Richfield, census tract 27053024200 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.7/10. On the national scale it ranks #60,078 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 24% of renter households, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,868 a month against an average household income of $135,119 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 8% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,356
Renter share10.3%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$135,119

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Promenade
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 11 tracts In Richfield
Very Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#263 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#1,243 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richfield and the region

Centroid at 44.8774, -93.3079 · click any tract to drill in

Why Promenade scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richfield
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,868 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richfield
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richfield
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richfield
4.4

How Promenade compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Promenade risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 024200Richfield: 5.15.1Richfieldparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 37Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.46%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.3%Peak (2011)
  • 4Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530242002009: 7 filings (6.48/100 renter HHs)2010: 7 filings (5.51/100 renter HHs)2011: 11 filings (7.33/100 renter HHs)2012: 8 filings (5.33/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 43% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 13Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.16×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Promenade

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.16x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 37 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 5.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.3% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053024200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053024200?

Census tract 27053024200 in the Promenade neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053024200?

Median gross rent is $1,868/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053024200?

2.7% of residents in tract 27053024200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,182.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053024200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 33th, minority 25th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 27053024200 considered part of Promenade?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053024200 fall within Promenade (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053024200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053024200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.46% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053024200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.16× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053024200 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053024200 compare to Richfield overall?

Tract 27053024200 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Richfield at 5.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richfield

Top eight tracts in Richfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related