Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally

North Indian Mound Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kansas City

Tract 29095000800 · Jackson County, MO · pop 3,501 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 4.4/10, tract 29095000800 in the North Indian Mound area of Kansas City, MO reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,501. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 19% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,429
Renter share33.4%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$51,627

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In North Indian Mound
Very Low
Within parent city
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#89 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
Moderate
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#97 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#450 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.1127, -94.5324 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Indian Mound scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$789 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How North Indian Mound compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Indian Mound risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 000800Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 771Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 9.93%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.2%Peak (2005)
  • 34Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950008002003: 43 filings (7.76/100 renter HHs)2004: 43 filings (7.76/100 renter HHs)2005: 80 filings (15.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 56 filings (10.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 54 filings (10.29/100 renter HHs)2008: 67 filings (12.76/100 renter HHs)2009: 59 filings (11.24/100 renter HHs)2010: 51 filings (10.10/100 renter HHs)2011: 68 filings (11.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 72 filings (11.96/100 renter HHs)2013: 47 filings (7.81/100 renter HHs)2014: 48 filings (7.97/100 renter HHs)2015: 49 filings (8.14/100 renter HHs)2017: 34 filings (6.01/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 21% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 201Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.46×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 5 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (1.04× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.22× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North Indian Mound. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Indian Mound

Average gross rent is $789, 36% below the Kansas City average. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Court records carry 771 eviction filings across 14 observed years. Housing insecurity runs 21.8% against 14.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 25.0% against 17.8% nationally. Filings peaked in 2005 at 15.2% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 9.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #42,813 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095000800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095000800?

Census tract 29095000800 in the North Indian Mound neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095000800?

Median gross rent is $789/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095000800?

11.7% of residents in tract 29095000800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,501.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095000800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 55th, minority 77th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 29095000800 considered part of North Indian Mound?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095000800 fall within North Indian Mound (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095000800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 771 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095000800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.93% of renter households, peaking at 15.2% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29095000800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.46× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29095000800 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29095000800 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095000800 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29095000800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related