Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Rockhill Eviction Risk: Lower , Kansas City

Tract 29095006600 · Jackson County, MO · pop 2,039 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 29095006600 sits in the Rockhill area of Kansas City eviction risk, MO, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.6/10. Population here is 2,039. The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 26% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,069
Renter share46.6%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$78,015

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rockhill
Moderate
Within parent city
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#118 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#139 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
Low
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#782 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.0455, -94.5797 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rockhill scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,253 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How Rockhill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rockhill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 006600Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 498Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 5.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.8%Peak (2005)
  • 9Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950066002003: 56 filings (7.93/100 renter HHs)2004: 45 filings (6.37/100 renter HHs)2005: 60 filings (10.81/100 renter HHs)2006: 60 filings (10.81/100 renter HHs)2007: 37 filings (6.67/100 renter HHs)2008: 42 filings (7.57/100 renter HHs)2009: 29 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 28 filings (5.15/100 renter HHs)2011: 23 filings (3.80/100 renter HHs)2012: 27 filings (4.46/100 renter HHs)2013: 37 filings (6.11/100 renter HHs)2014: 31 filings (5.12/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (2.31/100 renter HHs)2017: 9 filings (1.47/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 84% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 101Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.50×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rockhill

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.1/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.1% against 17.8% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 498 filings here across 14 tracked years.

It sits 0.6 points below the Jackson County average of 4.2. The worst year on record was 2005, when 10.8% of renter households were served.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 6.0% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095006600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095006600?

Census tract 29095006600 in the Rockhill neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095006600?

Median gross rent is $1,253/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095006600?

9.9% of residents in tract 29095006600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,039.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095006600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 1th, minority 44th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 29095006600 considered part of Rockhill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095006600 fall within Rockhill (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095006600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 498 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095006600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.99% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29095006600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.50× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29095006600 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29095006600 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095006600 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29095006600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related