Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Knoches Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kansas City

Tract 29095016400 · Jackson County, MO · pop 1,946 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 29095016400 in the Knoches Park area of Kansas City, MO reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,946. Against Jackson County at 43.0%, 24% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 36% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units785
Renter share46.6%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate27.2%
Median income$32,019

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Knoches Park
Moderate
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
High
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#38 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.0726, -94.5250 · click any tract to drill in

Why Knoches Park scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
27.2% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$884 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How Knoches Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Knoches Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 016400Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 646Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 12.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.9%Peak (2003)
  • 42Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950164002003: 75 filings (18.89/100 renter HHs)2004: 49 filings (12.34/100 renter HHs)2005: 49 filings (13.54/100 renter HHs)2006: 64 filings (17.68/100 renter HHs)2007: 55 filings (15.19/100 renter HHs)2008: 49 filings (13.54/100 renter HHs)2009: 49 filings (13.54/100 renter HHs)2010: 42 filings (10.74/100 renter HHs)2011: 23 filings (5.99/100 renter HHs)2012: 28 filings (7.29/100 renter HHs)2013: 26 filings (6.77/100 renter HHs)2014: 49 filings (12.76/100 renter HHs)2015: 46 filings (11.98/100 renter HHs)2017: 42 filings (10.29/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 44% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 176Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-08-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Knoches Park

Housing insecurity runs 32.7% against 14.2% nationally. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $32,019 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. At $884 a month, rents run 29% under what the rest of Kansas City commands.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 24.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.

The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. It sits 1.2 points above the Jackson County average of 4.2. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

The filing record is not thin: 646 evictions over 14 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2003, when 18.9% of renter households were served.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095016400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095016400?

Census tract 29095016400 in the Knoches Park neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095016400?

Median gross rent is $884/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095016400?

27.2% of residents in tract 29095016400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,946.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095016400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 85th, minority 87th, housing 58th.
Q5

Is tract 29095016400 considered part of Knoches Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095016400 fall within Knoches Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095016400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 646 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095016400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.18% of renter households, peaking at 18.9% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29095016400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29095016400 struggle to pay rent?

About 32.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 24.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29095016400 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095016400 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29095016400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related