Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally
Rose Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Missoula
Tract 30063001100 · Missoula County, MT · pop 3,363 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 30063001100, home to 3,363 residents in the Rose Park area of Missoula, scores 4.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 28% of US census tracts.
About 30% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $999 a month while the average household earns $63,307 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 58% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 41%
Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units1,515
Renter share58.3%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$63,307
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
29
th percentile
Low
Within county
57
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
71
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Missoula and the region
Centroid at 46.8600, -114.0080 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Park scores 4.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Missoula
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$999 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Missoula
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Missoula
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Missoula
5.5
How Rose Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 23%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.9%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 8.1%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 23.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rose Park
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Missoula eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Missoula County average of 4.8 and above the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 30063001100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30063001100?
Census tract 30063001100 in the Rose Park neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 30063001100?
Median gross rent is $999/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 30063001100?
10.3% of residents in tract 30063001100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,363.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 30063001100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 5th, minority 28th, housing 40th.
Q5
Is tract 30063001100 considered part of Rose Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30063001100 fall within Rose Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 30063001100 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 30063001100 compare to Missoula overall?
Tract 30063001100 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Missoula at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Missoula eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Missoula
Top eight tracts in Missoula ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MT
Heart of Missoula
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · MT
University District
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · MT
Lewis & Clark
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
River Road
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Franklin to the Fort
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Westside
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Franklin to the Fort
4.7
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
University District
4.7
/ 10 · Moderate
Related