The Old Market Eviction Risk: Moderate , Omaha
Tract 31055003300 · Douglas County, NE · pop 2,002 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
The Moderate-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 31055003300 reflects conditions in The Old Market in Omaha, Nebraska. That is riskier than about 38% of US census tracts.
About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $975 monthly, set against $41,042 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Omaha and the region
Centroid at 41.2413, -95.9495 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Old Market scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow The Old Market compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 94%Socioeconomic
- 89%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 71%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 22%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 362Total filings over 13 yrs
- 9.88%Avg annual filing rate
- 14.8%Peak (2002)
- 26Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within The Old Market. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 28.3%Housing insecurity
- 18.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.9%Food insecurity
- 32.5%SNAP enrollment
- 18.9%Transit barriers
- 32.1%No health insurance
- 19.1%Frequent mental distress
- 40.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in The Old Market
The heaviest input here is economic stress at 7.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Omaha eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Douglas County average of 4.8 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Part of this tract, about 22% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was B ("Still Desirable"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 31055003300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055003300?
What is the average rent in tract 31055003300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31055003300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31055003300?
Is tract 31055003300 considered part of The Old Market?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055003300?
What share of households in tract 31055003300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31055003300 compare to Omaha overall?
Was tract 31055003300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Omaha
Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.