Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally

Shaws Hill Eviction Risk: Lower , Portsmouth

Tract 33015069700 · Rockingham County, NH · pop 3,192 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Here is how census tract 33015069700, in Shaws Hill in Portsmouth eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 4.9/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,192. That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 39% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,757 monthly, set against $113,333 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 23% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 14% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,490
Renter share23.0%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$113,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Shaws Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Portsmouth
Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#48 of 72 tracts In Rockingham County
Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#291 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region

Centroid at 43.0699, -70.7407 · click any tract to drill in

Why Shaws Hill scores 1.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,757 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portsmouth
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portsmouth
4.5

How Shaws Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Shaws Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.41.4This tracttract 069700Portsmouth: 3.93.9Portsmouthparent cityCounty: 1.71.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Shaws Hill

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Rockingham County average of 4.6 and in line with the New Hampshire statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 18th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 33015069700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33015069700?

Census tract 33015069700 in the Shaws Hill neighborhood scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 33015069700?

Median gross rent is $1,757/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 33015069700?

3.0% of residents in tract 33015069700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,192.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 33015069700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 25th, minority 10th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 33015069700 considered part of Shaws Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33015069700 fall within Shaws Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 33015069700 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 33015069700 compare to Portsmouth overall?

Tract 33015069700 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Portsmouth at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth

Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related