Tract 33015107400 ·
Rockingham County, NH · pop 1,221 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
33015107400 is a census tract in the Pannaway Manor area of Portsmouth, NH. It scores 4.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,221 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 4%Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units451
Renter share4.4%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$122,321
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Pannaway Manor
Moderate
Within parent city
17th percentile
#6 of 7 tracts In Portsmouth
Very Low
Within county
45th percentile
#40 of 72 tracts In Rockingham County
Moderate
Within state
53th percentile
#165 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region
Centroid at 43.0629, -70.8030 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pannaway Manor scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portsmouth
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portsmouth
4.5
How Pannaway Manor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
8%Socioeconomic
37%Household composition
19%Racial/ethnic minority
18%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.1%Housing insecurity
4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
7.1%Food insecurity
4.3%SNAP enrollment
4.2%Transit barriers
5.2%No health insurance
13.1%Frequent mental distress
22.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pannaway Manor
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. SNAP participation runs 4.3% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 7.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Running cool, state political climate reads 2.5/10. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Rockingham County average of 4.3 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 33015107400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33015107400?
Census tract 33015107400 in the Pannaway Manor neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 33015107400?
2.9% of residents in tract 33015107400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,221.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 33015107400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 37th, minority 19th, housing 18th.
Q4
Is tract 33015107400 considered part of Pannaway Manor?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33015107400 fall within Pannaway Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 33015107400 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 33015107400 compare to Portsmouth overall?
Tract 33015107400 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Portsmouth at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth
Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.