Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

Manordome Eviction Risk: Elevated , Hackensack

Tract 34003023201 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,762 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 7.7/10, tract 34003023201 in the Manordome area of Hackensack, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 23% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,885
Renter share48.3%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$87,292

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Manordome
Very Low
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 12 tracts In Hackensack
Very Low
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
High
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#477 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hackensack and the region

Centroid at 40.8986, -74.0461 · click any tract to drill in

Why Manordome scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hackensack
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,679 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hackensack
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hackensack
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hackensack
6.1

How Manordome compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Manordome risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.7This tracttract 0232017.2Hackensackparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Manordome. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Manordome

28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

It sits 1.4 points above the Bergen County average of 6.3. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.

Against Bergen County at 46.6%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,679, 12% below the Hackensack average.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003023201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003023201?

Census tract 34003023201 in the Manordome neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003023201?

Median gross rent is $1,679/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003023201?

5.4% of residents in tract 34003023201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,762.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003023201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 16th, minority 81th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 34003023201 considered part of Manordome?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003023201 fall within Manordome (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 34003023201 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34003023201 compare to Hackensack overall?

Tract 34003023201 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Hackensack at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hackensack eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34003023201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hackensack

Top eight tracts in Hackensack ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related