Neighborhood · Ranked #3,751 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: High , Camden

Tract 34007603002 · Camden County, NJ · pop 4,513 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is the Rosedale area of Camden for landlords? Census tract 34007603002 scores 6.9/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,452 a month while the average household earns $92,616 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

9.4

High

Confidence 80% · 1-10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 8% Owners 82%

Tract context

Occupied units1,372

Renter share18.4%

SVI overall0.82

Poverty rate15.1%

Median income$92,616

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Camden and the region

Centroid at 39.9565, -75.0626 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 9.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Camden

6.8

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.7

State political climate

New Jersey legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

15.1% poverty · this tract

3.8

Supply constraint

$1,452 rent vs county FMR

3.1

Rent control risk

Inherited from Camden

6.8

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

5.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Camden

4.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Camden

5.0

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

84%Socioeconomic
87%Household composition
86%Racial/ethnic minority
45%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
19%Grade B
81%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

223Total filings over 6 yrs
14.89%Avg annual filing rate
23.9%Peak (2013)
28Filings in 2018 (latest validated)

Filings by year 2013 to 2018

Filings dropped 49% over the past 6 months.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

20.5%Housing insecurity
10.8%Utility-shutoff threat
24.6%Food insecurity
14.6%SNAP enrollment
11.4%Transit barriers
19.0%No health insurance
16.5%Frequent mental distress
29.8%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camden eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007603002

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603002?

Census tract 34007603002 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 9.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 34007603002?

Median gross rent is $1,452/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603002?

15.1% of residents in tract 34007603002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,513.

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 87th, minority 86th, housing 45th.

Is tract 34007603002 considered part of Rosedale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007603002 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603002?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 223 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007603002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.89% of renter households, peaking at 23.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

What share of households in tract 34007603002 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 34007603002 compare to Camden overall?

Tract 34007603002 scores 9.4/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 34007603002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.