Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Rosedale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Camden
Tract 34007603002 · Camden County, NJ · pop 4,513 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
34007603002 is a census tract in the Rosedale area of Camden County, NJ. It scores 5.8/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 8%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,372
Renter share18.4%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate15.1%
Median income$92,616
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
58
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
53
th percentile
Moderate
National
76
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9565, -75.0626 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosedale scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.1% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,452 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
5.0
How Rosedale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 82
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 19%Grade B
- 81%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 223Total filings over 6 yrs
- 14.89%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.9%Peak (2013)
- 28Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 49% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.5%Housing insecurity
- 10.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.6%Food insecurity
- 14.6%SNAP enrollment
- 11.4%Transit barriers
- 19.0%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 29.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosedale
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Cost burden runs 55% here against 48.5% across Camden County. Running cool, supply constraint reads 3.1/10.
Court records carry 223 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Adults with no health insurance runs 19.0% against 11.3% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 23.9% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 14.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #20,506 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007603002
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603002?
Census tract 34007603002 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007603002?
Median gross rent is $1,452/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603002?
15.1% of residents in tract 34007603002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,513.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603002?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 87th, minority 86th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 34007603002 considered part of Rosedale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007603002 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603002?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 223 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007603002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.89% of renter households, peaking at 23.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007603002 struggle to pay rent?
About 20.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007603002 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007603002 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007603002 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related