Rosedale Eviction Risk: Elevated
2 census tracts · pop 9,557 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 7.4/10 · range 5.8–8.8
Rosedale takes in 2 census tracts of Camden, NJ and houses 9,557 people. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 7.4/10, Elevated tier. Scores across the 2 constituent tracts range from 5.8 to 8.8. A 3-point internal spread means block-level underwriting beats area-level here.
Against a Camden baseline of 37.0%, about half of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line. 25.2% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt.
The clearest offset is supply constraint, at 2.1/10. The severe-burden share is 17%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.
Food insecurity affects 33.5% of adults, 15.7 points above the national rate. Court records carry 849 eviction filings across its 2 observed tracts. The poverty rate is 17%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest.
Filing activity peaked in 2013 at 23.9% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 10.3% in 2018, is well off that peak.
That places it #15 of 17 neighborhoods in Camden. The closest comparables inside the same city are Stockton and Biedman. Social vulnerability runs high at 9.1/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.
For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 7.4 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Rosedale and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 5.8–8.8
Why Rosedale scores 7.4
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyRosedale vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
2 tracts in Rosedale
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34007601102 | 8.8 | 5,044 | 42% | $1,110 |
| 34007603002 | 5.8 | 4,513 | 55% | $1,452 |
CDC SVI percentile: 90
Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Court-record eviction history in Rosedale
Aggregated across 2 validated constituent tracts. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 849Total filings (sum)
- 13.66%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.9%Peak year (2013)
- 10.34%Latest filed (2018)
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Rosedale
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 26.5%Housing insecurity
- 14.7%Utility shutoff threat
- 34.0%Food insecurity
- 22.9%SNAP enrollment
- 25.5%No health insurance
- 35.0%Any disability
About Rosedale
How does Rosedale compare to Camden overall?
What is the average rent in Rosedale?
What percentage of Rosedale residents are renters?
Is Rosedale a high social-vulnerability area?
Which tracts in Rosedale have the highest eviction risk?
How safe is Rosedale for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Rosedale?
Other neighborhoods near Rosedale
Other neighborhoods inside Camden
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Rosedale.