Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally
Biedman Eviction Risk: Moderate , Camden
Tract 34007610500 · Camden County, NJ · pop 7,059 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 34007610500 covers the Biedman neighborhood of Camden in New Jersey. Home to 7,059 residents, it scores 6.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,116 monthly, set against $85,164 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,242
Renter share25.3%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate15.4%
Median income$85,164
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
61
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
64
th percentile
Elevated
National
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9659, -75.0808 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biedman scores 4.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.4% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,116 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
5.0
How Biedman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 5%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 445Total filings over 6 yrs
- 15.71%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.8%Peak (2016)
- 80Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Biedman. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.3%Housing insecurity
- 10.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.0%Food insecurity
- 14.5%SNAP enrollment
- 11.2%Transit barriers
- 18.5%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 29.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biedman
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camden eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 20.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 445 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 15.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.8% of renter households in 2016.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007610500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007610500?
Census tract 34007610500 in the Biedman neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007610500?
Median gross rent is $1,116/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007610500?
15.4% of residents in tract 34007610500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,059.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007610500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 85th, minority 89th, housing 32th.
Q5
Is tract 34007610500 considered part of Biedman?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007610500 fall within Biedman (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007610500?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 445 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007610500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.71% of renter households, peaking at 17.8% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007610500 struggle to pay rent?
About 20.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007610500 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007610500 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Camden at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007610500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related