Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Biedman Eviction Risk: Elevated , Camden
Tract 34007610500 · Camden County, NJ · pop 7,059 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 34007610500 sits in the Biedman area of Camden County, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6/10. Population here is 7,059. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,242
Renter share25.3%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate15.4%
Median income$85,164
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
62
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
56
th percentile
Elevated
National
78
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9659, -75.0808 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biedman scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.4% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,116 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
5.0
How Biedman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 5%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 445Total filings over 6 yrs
- 15.71%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.8%Peak (2016)
- 80Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Biedman. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.3%Housing insecurity
- 10.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.0%Food insecurity
- 14.5%SNAP enrollment
- 11.2%Transit barriers
- 18.5%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 29.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biedman
Against Camden County at 48.5%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.2/10.
Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Court records carry 445 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Adults with no health insurance runs 18.5% against 11.3% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2016 at 17.8% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 15.7% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $85,164, annual rent is just 16%.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007610500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007610500?
Census tract 34007610500 in the Biedman neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007610500?
Median gross rent is $1,116/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007610500?
15.4% of residents in tract 34007610500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,059.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007610500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 85th, minority 89th, housing 32th.
Q5
Is tract 34007610500 considered part of Biedman?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007610500 fall within Biedman (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007610500?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 445 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007610500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.71% of renter households, peaking at 17.8% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007610500 struggle to pay rent?
About 20.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007610500 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007610500 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007610500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related