Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,427 of 84,120 nationally
Biedman Eviction Risk: Elevated , Camden
Tract 34007601000 · Camden County, NJ · pop 5,645 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Biedman in Camden anchors census tract 34007601000, which lands at 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 96th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 56% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,213 a month against an average household income of $61,513 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,672
Renter share47.1%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$61,513
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
84
th percentile
High
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9612, -75.0902 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biedman scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,213 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
7.0
How Biedman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 94%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 62%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,229Total filings over 6 yrs
- 24.38%Avg annual filing rate
- 27.7%Peak (2014)
- 173Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 19% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Biedman. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.2%Housing insecurity
- 15.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 35.9%Food insecurity
- 22.3%SNAP enrollment
- 16.0%Transit barriers
- 31.1%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 35.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biedman
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camden eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1,229 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 24.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 27.7% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007601000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007601000?
Census tract 34007601000 in the Biedman neighborhood scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007601000?
Median gross rent is $1,213/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007601000?
12.4% of residents in tract 34007601000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,645.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007601000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 94th, minority 97th, housing 61th.
Q5
Is tract 34007601000 considered part of Biedman?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007601000 fall within Biedman (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007601000?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1,229 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007601000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 24.38% of renter households, peaking at 27.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007601000 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007601000 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007601000 scores 7.4/10, lower than the parent city of Camden at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007601000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Camden
Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NJ
Pyne Point
9.4
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Cramer Hill
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Centerville
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Bergen Square
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Marlton
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Morgan Village
9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · NJ
Stockton
8.9
/ 10 · High
Tract · NJ
Central Waterfront
8.8
/ 10 · High
Related