Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Mount Ephraim Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34007611700 · Camden County, NJ · pop 2,945 · 51% of tract blocks fall in Mount Ephraim
Census tract 34007611700 covers part of Mount Ephraim, NJ, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,075
Renter share26.3%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate13.2%
Median income$103,482
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
48
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
45
th percentile
Moderate
National
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mount Ephraim and the region
Centroid at 39.8861, -75.0891 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Ephraim scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mount Ephraim
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.2% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,819 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Ephraim
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Ephraim
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Ephraim
4.2
How Mount Ephraim compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 51%Socioeconomic
- 51%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 95%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 199Total filings over 6 yrs
- 14.17%Avg annual filing rate
- 19.9%Peak (2015)
- 16Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 59% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.6%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.0%Transit barriers
- 8.8%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 27.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mount Ephraim
Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $1,819, 32% above the Mount Ephraim average.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.1/10. The filing record is not thin: 199 evictions over 6 years of observation.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7/10. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2015 at 19.9% of renter households.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 14.2% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #24,859 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5/10. 52% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
It tracks the Camden County average of 5.7 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007611700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007611700?
Census tract 34007611700 in Mount Ephraim scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007611700?
Median gross rent is $1,819/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007611700?
13.2% of residents in tract 34007611700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,945.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007611700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 51th, minority 29th, housing 38th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007611700?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 199 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007611700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.17% of renter households, peaking at 19.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007611700 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007611700 compare to Mount Ephraim overall?
Tract 34007611700 scores 5.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Mount Ephraim at 5.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Ephraim; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007611700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mount Ephraim
Top eight tracts in Mount Ephraim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related