Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally
Farmingdale Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34025811600 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 1,326
34025811600 is a census tract in Farmingdale, NJ. It scores 6.7/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,326 residents. Against Monmouth County at 47.3%, roughly three in four of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units582
Renter share42.6%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$97,574
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
National
83
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Farmingdale and the region
Centroid at 40.1984, -74.1701 · click any tract to drill in
Why Farmingdale scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Farmingdale
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,548 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Farmingdale
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Farmingdale
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Farmingdale
5.4
How Farmingdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 103Total filings over 2 yrs
- 18.62%Avg annual filing rate
- 21.3%Peak (2013)
- 44Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.2%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 9.0%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 23.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Farmingdale
Severe burden reaches 33%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10. Against the Monmouth County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points.
Court records carry 103 eviction filings across 2 observed years. SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2013 at 21.3% of renter households.
In a typical year about 18.6% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025811600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025811600?
Census tract 34025811600 in Farmingdale scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025811600?
Median gross rent is $1,548/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025811600?
2.2% of residents in tract 34025811600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,326.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025811600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 15th, minority 19th, housing 22th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025811600?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 103 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025811600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.62% of renter households, peaking at 21.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34025811600 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34025811600 compare to Farmingdale overall?
Tract 34025811600 scores 6.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Farmingdale at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Farmingdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related
Explore the geography around tract 34025811600
Parent city ↑
Farmingdale
6.6 / 10
Parent county ↑
Monmouth County
Parent state ↑
New Jersey
Sibling tract →
Green and White Village
6.7 / 10
Sibling tract →
Tract 34025807402
6.7 / 10
Sibling tract →
Tract 34025808902
6.7 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts