Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 34039032300 Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 34039032300 · Union County, NJ · pop 2,907

34039032300 is a census tract in Union County, NJ. It scores 7.6/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,907. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.9/10.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 32% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units990
Renter share54.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate16.3%
Median income$74,303

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 120 tracts In Union County
Elevated
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#498 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
National
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#9,927 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Union County and the region

Centroid at 40.7025, -74.2327 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 34039032300 scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.3% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,613 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 34039032300 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 34039032300 risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.6This tracttract 0323006.6Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 352Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 18.92%Avg annual filing rate
  • 36.6%Peak (2013)
  • 53Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34039032300
Filings dropped 69% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 34039032300

The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.5/10. It sits 1.0 points above the Union County average of 6.6.

Food insecurity runs 26.6% against 17.8% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 352 evictions over 4 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 36.6% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 18.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 7.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34039032300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039032300?

Census tract 34039032300 in Union County scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34039032300?

Median gross rent is $1,613/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34039032300?

16.3% of residents in tract 34039032300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,907.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34039032300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 76th, minority 93th, housing 20th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039032300?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 352 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34039032300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.92% of renter households, peaking at 36.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34039032300 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

Was tract 34039032300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related