Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Tanoan Eviction Risk: Moderate , Albuquerque

Tract 35001003738 · Bernalillo County, NM · pop 5,266 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.4/10 for census tract 35001003738 reflects conditions in Tanoan in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It lands near the 85th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 63% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,578 a month against an average household income of $64,504 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 24% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units2,539
Renter share65.0%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$64,504

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 tracts In Tanoan
Very High
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#94 of 149 tracts In Albuquerque
Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 176 tracts In Bernalillo County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#399 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Albuquerque and the region

Centroid at 35.1482, -106.5162 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanoan scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Albuquerque
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,578 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Albuquerque
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.0

How Tanoan compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanoan risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 003738Albuquerque: 4.24.2Albuquerqueparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 889Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 5.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.0%Peak (2009)
  • 62Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 350010037382000: 45 filings (5.15/100 renter HHs)2001: 20 filings (2.29/100 renter HHs)2002: 26 filings (2.98/100 renter HHs)2003: 38 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2004: 53 filings (6.07/100 renter HHs)2005: 80 filings (9.19/100 renter HHs)2006: 58 filings (6.66/100 renter HHs)2007: 46 filings (5.28/100 renter HHs)2008: 79 filings (9.08/100 renter HHs)2009: 87 filings (9.99/100 renter HHs)2010: 77 filings (5.14/100 renter HHs)2011: 62 filings (4.18/100 renter HHs)2012: 81 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2013: 75 filings (5.06/100 renter HHs)2014: 62 filings (4.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 15 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 223Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2020-02-01: 11 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (1.74× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (1.35× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-05-01: 9 filings (2.08× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Albuquerque, NM as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanoan. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanoan

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 6.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bernalillo County average of 6.1 and above the New Mexico statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 37th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.51x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 35001003738

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35001003738?

Census tract 35001003738 in the Tanoan neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 35001003738?

Median gross rent is $1,578/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 35001003738?

10.2% of residents in tract 35001003738 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,266.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 35001003738?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 13th, minority 67th, housing 62th.
Q5

Is tract 35001003738 considered part of Tanoan?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 35001003738 fall within Tanoan (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 35001003738?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 889 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 35001003738 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.67% of renter households, peaking at 10.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 35001003738 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Albuquerque eviction risk, NM), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 35001003738 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 35001003738 compare to Albuquerque overall?

Tract 35001003738 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Albuquerque at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Albuquerque

Top eight tracts in Albuquerque ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related