Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Roselawn Eviction Risk: Moderate , Brighton

Tract 36055012700 · Monroe County, NY · pop 3,928 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

36055012700 is a census tract in the Roselawn area of Brighton, NY. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,928 residents. Cost burden runs about a quarter here against 46.4% across Monroe County.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 12% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,469
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$120,753

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Roselawn
Very High
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 9 tracts In Brighton
Low
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#165 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#4,717 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brighton and the region

Centroid at 43.1290, -77.5612 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roselawn scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,278 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brighton
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brighton
5.5

How Roselawn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roselawn risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 0127006.6Brightonparent city7.2Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Roselawn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roselawn

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Against the Monroe County average of 7.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.6/10. Disability prevalence runs 19.3% against 31.5% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 4.8% against 15.2% nationally. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, state political climate reads 7.3/10.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $120,753, annual rent is just 13%.

Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 2.5 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055012700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055012700?

Census tract 36055012700 in the Roselawn neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055012700?

Median gross rent is $1,278/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055012700?

2.6% of residents in tract 36055012700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,928.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055012700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 48th, minority 33th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 36055012700 considered part of Roselawn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055012700 fall within Roselawn (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055012700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055012700 compare to Brighton overall?

Tract 36055012700 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Brighton at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brighton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055012700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brighton

Top eight tracts in Brighton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related