Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Roselawn Eviction Risk: Lower , Brighton

Tract 36055012700 · Monroe County, NY · pop 3,928 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.4/10 for census tract 36055012700 reflects conditions in the Roselawn neighborhood of Brighton, New York. It lands near the 53rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,278 monthly, set against $120,753 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 12% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,469
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$120,753

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Roselawn
Moderate
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Brighton
Very Low
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#201 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Very Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#4,487 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brighton and the region

Centroid at 43.1290, -77.5612 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roselawn scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,278 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brighton
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brighton
5.5

How Roselawn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roselawn risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 012700Brighton: 7.97.9Brightonparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Roselawn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roselawn

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brighton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Monroe County average of 6.1 and below the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055012700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055012700?

Census tract 36055012700 in the Roselawn neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055012700?

Median gross rent is $1,278/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055012700?

2.6% of residents in tract 36055012700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,928.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055012700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 48th, minority 33th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 36055012700 considered part of Roselawn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055012700 fall within Roselawn (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055012700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055012700 compare to Brighton overall?

Tract 36055012700 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Brighton at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brighton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055012700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brighton

Top eight tracts in Brighton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related