Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Roselawn Eviction Risk: Lower , Brighton

Tract 36055012900 · Monroe County, NY · pop 5,382 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Roselawn neighborhood of Brighton is where census tract 36055012900 sits, home to 5,382 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 6.2/10. It lands near the 80th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,493 monthly, set against $129,485 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 14% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,323
Renter share34.5%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$129,485

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Roselawn
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 9 tracts In Brighton
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#206 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#4,546 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brighton and the region

Centroid at 43.1209, -77.5819 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roselawn scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,493 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brighton
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brighton
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brighton
5.5

How Roselawn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roselawn risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 012900Brighton: 7.97.9Brightonparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 32

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Roselawn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roselawn

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brighton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Monroe County average of 6.1 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055012900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055012900?

Census tract 36055012900 in the Roselawn neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055012900?

Median gross rent is $1,493/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055012900?

4.0% of residents in tract 36055012900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,382.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055012900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 46th, minority 39th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 36055012900 considered part of Roselawn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055012900 fall within Roselawn (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055012900 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055012900 compare to Brighton overall?

Tract 36055012900 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Brighton at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brighton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055012900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brighton

Top eight tracts in Brighton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related