Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Bayswater Eviction Risk: High , Inwood

Tract 36059411000 · Nassau County, NY · pop 6,081 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 9.3/10, tract 36059411000 in the Bayswater area of Inwood, NY reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,081. 48% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 13% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,647
Renter share36.6%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate12.7%
Median income$95,516

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bayswater
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Inwood
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 281 tracts In Nassau County
Very High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,493 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Inwood and the region

Centroid at 40.6213, -73.7570 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bayswater scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Inwood
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$2,055 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Inwood
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Inwood
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Inwood
7.8

How Bayswater compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bayswater risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.3This tracttract 4110007.9Inwoodparent city6.5Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bayswater

Cost burden runs around two-thirds here against 44.5% across Nassau County. Against the Nassau County average of 6.5, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.8 points. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9/10. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 7.8/10. Housing insecurity runs 24.4% against 14.2% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 23.2% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Queens. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.9/10.

Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $2,055, close to the Inwood average. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $95,516.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36059411000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059411000?

Census tract 36059411000 in the Bayswater neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36059411000?

Median gross rent is $2,055/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36059411000?

12.7% of residents in tract 36059411000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,081.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36059411000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 60th, minority 77th, housing 52th.
Q5

Is tract 36059411000 considered part of Bayswater?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36059411000 fall within Bayswater (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36059411000 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36059411000 compare to Inwood overall?

Tract 36059411000 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Inwood at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Inwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36059411000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Inwood

Top eight tracts in Inwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related