Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,727 of 84,120 nationally

Love Canal Eviction Risk: Elevated , Niagara Falls

Tract 36063022100 · Niagara County, NY · pop 2,076 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

36063022100 is a census tract in the Love Canal area of Niagara Falls, NY. It scores 7.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,076. Severe burden reaches 34%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 12% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,006
Renter share23.1%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$50,538

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Love Canal
High
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#16 of 20 tracts In Niagara Falls
Low
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 65 tracts In Niagara County
Elevated
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#3,203 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Niagara Falls and the region

Centroid at 43.0877, -78.9789 · click any tract to drill in

Why Love Canal scores 7.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Niagara Falls
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,003 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.4

How Love Canal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Love Canal risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.4This tracttract 0221007.1Niagara Fallsparent city6.4Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Love Canal. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Love Canal

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.5/10. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.4/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Against Niagara County at 40.9%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened.

At $1,003 a month, rents run 22% over what the rest of Niagara Falls commands. It sits 1.0 points above the Niagara County average of 6.4.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #10,727 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 4.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $50,538.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36063022100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36063022100?

Census tract 36063022100 in the Love Canal neighborhood scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36063022100?

Median gross rent is $1,003/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36063022100?

9.9% of residents in tract 36063022100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,076.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36063022100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 75th, minority 20th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 36063022100 considered part of Love Canal?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36063022100 fall within Love Canal (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36063022100 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36063022100 compare to Niagara Falls overall?

Tract 36063022100 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Niagara Falls at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Niagara Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36063022100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Niagara Falls

Top eight tracts in Niagara Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related