Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

Love Canal Eviction Risk: Elevated , Niagara Falls

Tract 36063022200 · Niagara County, NY · pop 3,509 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 36063022200 covers part of the Love Canal area of Niagara Falls, NY, and scores 7.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,509. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 14% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,803
Renter share24.2%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate18.1%
Median income$70,307

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Love Canal
Very High
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 20 tracts In Niagara Falls
Low
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#18 of 65 tracts In Niagara County
Elevated
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#3,108 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Niagara Falls and the region

Centroid at 43.0730, -78.9695 · click any tract to drill in

Why Love Canal scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Niagara Falls
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
18.1% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$774 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.4

How Love Canal compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Love Canal risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.7This tracttract 0222007.1Niagara Fallsparent city6.4Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 45

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Love Canal. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Love Canal

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.4/10.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.6/10. Against the Niagara County average of 6.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Niagara Falls. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5/10. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $70,307, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Rent takes 30% or more of income for 42% of renters. Average gross rent is $774, close to the Niagara Falls average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36063022200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36063022200?

Census tract 36063022200 in the Love Canal neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36063022200?

Median gross rent is $774/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36063022200?

18.1% of residents in tract 36063022200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,509.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36063022200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 21th, minority 18th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 36063022200 considered part of Love Canal?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36063022200 fall within Love Canal (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36063022200 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36063022200 compare to Niagara Falls overall?

Tract 36063022200 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Niagara Falls at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Niagara Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36063022200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Niagara Falls

Top eight tracts in Niagara Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related