Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Love Canal Eviction Risk: Moderate , Niagara Falls
Tract 36063022714 ·
Niagara County, NY · pop 4,296 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Tract 36063022714 sits in the Love Canal area of Niagara County, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.5/10.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%Stable renters 19%Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,920
Renter share36.5%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$79,674
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#6 of 6 tracts In Love Canal
Very Low
Within county
20th percentile
#52 of 65 tracts In Niagara County
Low
Within state
9th percentile
#4,918 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
National
59th percentile
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Niagara Falls and the region
Centroid at 43.0779, -78.9310 · click any tract to drill in
Why Love Canal scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Niagara Falls
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$765 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Niagara Falls
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Niagara Falls
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Niagara Falls
5.0
How Love Canal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
17%Socioeconomic
49%Household composition
11%Racial/ethnic minority
81%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Love Canal. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.8%Housing insecurity
4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
8.4%Food insecurity
7.0%SNAP enrollment
5.1%Transit barriers
4.1%No health insurance
13.4%Frequent mental distress
25.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Love Canal
23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.5/10. It sits 1.5 points below the Niagara County average of 6.4.
Cost burden runs 48% here against 40.9% across Niagara County. Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, state political climate reads 7.3/10.
SNAP participation runs 7.0% against 15.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 4.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $79,674, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 2.8 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 36063022714
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36063022714?
Census tract 36063022714 in the Love Canal neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36063022714?
Median gross rent is $765/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36063022714?
6.1% of residents in tract 36063022714 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,296.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36063022714?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 49th, minority 11th, housing 81th.
Q5
Is tract 36063022714 considered part of Love Canal?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36063022714 fall within Love Canal (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 36063022714 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 36063022714 compare to Niagara Falls overall?
Tract 36063022714 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Niagara Falls at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Niagara Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 36063022714 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.