Census Tract · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally

Mattydale Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 36067013900 · Onondaga County, NY · pop 2,662 · 74% of tract blocks fall in Mattydale

With a score of 6.3/10, tract 36067013900 in Mattydale, NY reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,662. The severe-burden share is 31%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score

6.3

Elevated

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 11% Owners 81%

Tract context

Occupied units1,059

Renter share18.7%

SVI overall0.23

Poverty rate14.1%

Median income$68,693

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Mattydale and the region

Centroid at 43.1076, -76.1311 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mattydale scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Mattydale

6.4

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.0

State political climate

New York legislature & governorship

7.3

Economic stress

14.1% poverty · this tract

3.5

Supply constraint

$950 rent vs county FMR

2.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Mattydale

4.9

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.6

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Mattydale

5.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Mattydale

5.1

How Mattydale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

22%Socioeconomic
81%Household composition
32%Racial/ethnic minority
8%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
27%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

14.0%Housing insecurity
8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
15.8%Food insecurity
14.8%SNAP enrollment
8.6%Transit barriers
6.9%No health insurance
18.7%Frequent mental distress
29.9%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mattydale

The clearest offset is supply constraint at 2.2/10. Running hot, state political climate reads 7.3/10.

At $950 a month, rents run 18% under what the rest of Mattydale commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Syracuse. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #16,571 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 19% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $68,693, annual rent is just 17%.

Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 40% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36067013900

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36067013900?

Census tract 36067013900 in Mattydale scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 36067013900?

Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 36067013900?

14.1% of residents in tract 36067013900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,662.

How socially vulnerable is tract 36067013900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 81th, minority 32th, housing 8th.

What share of households in tract 36067013900 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 36067013900 compare to Mattydale overall?

Tract 36067013900 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of Mattydale at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mattydale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 36067013900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mattydale

Top eight tracts in Mattydale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.