Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #6,676 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: High , New York

Tract 36081066402 · Queens County, NY · pop 3,260 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 8.2/10, tract 36081066402 in the Rosedale area of New York, NY reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,260 residents. Cost burden runs 80% here against 49.8% across Queens County.

Risk score
8.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 6% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,061
Renter share27.9%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$109,863

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Rosedale
Very Low
Within parent city
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#2,305 of 2,324 tracts In New York
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#656 of 724 tracts In Queens County
Very Low
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#2,473 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across New York and the region

Centroid at 40.6562, -73.7377 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 8.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from New York
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,209 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from New York
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from New York
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from New York
7.1

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosedale risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.2This tracttract 0664029.6New Yorkparent city9.3Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10. The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.1/10. At $2,209 a month, rents run 21% over what the rest of New York commands.

Against the Queens County average of 9.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points. Housing insecurity runs 21.7% against 14.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Queens. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 92% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $109,863. 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36081066402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36081066402?

Census tract 36081066402 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 8.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36081066402?

Median gross rent is $2,209/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 80% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36081066402?

3.9% of residents in tract 36081066402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,260.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36081066402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 34th, minority 93th, housing 26th.
Q5

Is tract 36081066402 considered part of Rosedale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36081066402 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36081066402 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36081066402 compare to New York overall?

Tract 36081066402 scores 8.2/10, lower than the parent city of New York at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from New York eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36081066402 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in New York

Top eight tracts in New York ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related