Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Cottesmore Eviction Risk: Lower , High Point

Tract 37081016204 · Guilford County, NC · pop 4,669 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 4.8/10, tract 37081016204 in the Cottesmore neighborhood of High Point ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,669 residents. It lands near the 31st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

30% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,469 a month against an average household income of $126,726 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 9% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,651
Renter share12.5%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$126,726

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cottesmore
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 33 tracts In High Point
Very Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#120 of 126 tracts In Guilford County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,306 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across High Point and the region

Centroid at 36.0654, -79.9824 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cottesmore scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from High Point
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,469 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from High Point
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from High Point
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from High Point
3.0

How Cottesmore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cottesmore risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 016204High Point: 2.92.9High Pointparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 51Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 13.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 27.5%Peak (2014)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370810162042005: 1 filings (0.33/100 renter HHs)2013: 14 filings (20.29/100 renter HHs)2014: 19 filings (27.54/100 renter HHs)2015: 13 filings (18.84/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 300% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cottesmore

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from High Point eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Guilford County average of 5.5 and below the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37081016204

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081016204?

Census tract 37081016204 in the Cottesmore neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37081016204?

Median gross rent is $2,469/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37081016204?

4.8% of residents in tract 37081016204 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,669.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37081016204?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 53th, minority 59th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 37081016204 considered part of Cottesmore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081016204 fall within Cottesmore (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081016204?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 51 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081016204 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.84% of renter households, peaking at 27.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37081016204 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37081016204 compare to High Point overall?

Tract 37081016204 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of High Point at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from High Point eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in High Point

Top eight tracts in High Point ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related