Tract 37097061103 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 37097061103 · Iredell County, NC · pop 2,905
Tract 37097061103 sits in Iredell County, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. 50% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Iredell County average of 34.7%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Iredell County and the region
Centroid at 35.7395, -81.0226 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 37097061103 scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 37097061103 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 75%Socioeconomic
- 68%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 88Total filings over 3 yrs
- 21.58%Avg annual filing rate
- 31.1%Peak (2003)
- 21Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.1%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.6%Food insecurity
- 16.6%SNAP enrollment
- 9.8%Transit barriers
- 12.1%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 40.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tract 37097061103
29% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.6/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.5/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.3/10. Against the Iredell County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. The filing record is not thin: 88 evictions over 3 years of observation.
Filings peaked in 2003 at 31.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 21.6% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.