Chapel Cove Eviction Risk: Lower , Charlotte

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 31.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. 36% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Mecklenburg County average of 45.3%.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.6/10. It sits 1.0 points below the Mecklenburg County average of 4.0. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 2.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.