Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Fairmount Circle Eviction Risk: Moderate , University Heights
Tract 39035187106 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 4,387 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 4.1/10, tract 39035187106 in the Fairmount Circle area of University Heights, OH reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,387. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 8.2/10.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units1,270
Renter share38.4%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$71,368
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
44
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
55
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across University Heights and the region
Centroid at 41.4939, -81.5223 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairmount Circle scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from University Heights
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,425 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from University Heights
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from University Heights
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from University Heights
6.3
How Fairmount Circle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 20
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 12%Grade A
- 1%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 321Total filings over 12 yrs
- 5.71%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.9%Peak (2011)
- 9Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fairmount Circle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.8%Food insecurity
- 7.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairmount Circle
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.2/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10. The voucher gap is 18.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Court records carry 321 eviction filings across 12 observed years. Food insecurity runs 9.8% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2011, when 11.9% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.7% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.8/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39035187106
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035187106?
Census tract 39035187106 in the Fairmount Circle neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39035187106?
Median gross rent is $1,425/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39035187106?
11.3% of residents in tract 39035187106 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,387.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39035187106?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 10th, minority 28th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 39035187106 considered part of Fairmount Circle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39035187106 fall within Fairmount Circle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39035187106?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 321 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 39035187106 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.71% of renter households, peaking at 11.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39035187106 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39035187106 compare to University Heights overall?
Tract 39035187106 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of University Heights at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from University Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39035187106 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in University Heights
Top eight tracts in University Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related