Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Faxon Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Cincinnati

Tract 39061005000 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,979 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

How risky is the Faxon Hills neighborhood of Cincinnati for landlords? Census tract 39061005000 scores 5.2/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 45% of US census tracts.

36% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,225 a month while the average household earns $125,077 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 44% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 28% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units2,316
Renter share44.0%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$125,077

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Faxon Hills
Low
Within parent city
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#106 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
Very Low
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#155 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#2,171 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1415, -84.4453 · click any tract to drill in

Why Faxon Hills scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,225 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Faxon Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Faxon Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 005000Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 199Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 0.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.6%Peak (2004)
  • 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610050002002: 18 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2003: 18 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2004: 26 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2005: 21 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2006: 15 filings (1.01/100 renter HHs)2007: 14 filings (0.94/100 renter HHs)2008: 17 filings (1.14/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (1.01/100 renter HHs)2010: 12 filings (0.83/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (0.30/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (0.53/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (0.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 13 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)2015: 7 filings (0.53/100 renter HHs)2016: 5 filings (0.39/100 renter HHs)2018: 3 filings (0.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 83% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 105Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.30×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (6.67× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (7.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (12.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (6.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (3.75× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (8.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Faxon Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Faxon Hills

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 13th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 199 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 0.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.6% of renter households in 2004.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061005000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061005000?

Census tract 39061005000 in the Faxon Hills neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061005000?

Median gross rent is $1,225/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061005000?

7.1% of residents in tract 39061005000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,979.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061005000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 1th, minority 26th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 39061005000 considered part of Faxon Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061005000 fall within Faxon Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061005000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 199 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061005000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.84% of renter households, peaking at 1.6% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061005000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.30× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061005000 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061005000 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061005000 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related