Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally

Skyline Acres Eviction Risk: Lower , Mount Healthy

Tract 39061021604 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,961 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 39061021604 belongs to the Skyline Acres neighborhood of Mount Healthy, Ohio. It is home to 3,961 residents and scores 5.5/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 56% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,267 a month while the average household earns $67,771 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 13% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,505
Renter share18.9%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$67,771

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Skyline Acres
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Mount Healthy
Very Low
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#143 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#1,867 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mount Healthy and the region

Centroid at 39.2322, -84.5671 · click any tract to drill in

Why Skyline Acres scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Healthy
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,267 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Healthy
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Healthy
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Healthy
6.7

How Skyline Acres compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Skyline Acres risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 021604Mount Healthy: 2.82.8Mount Healthyparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 478Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 13.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 28.8%Peak (2009)
  • 32Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610216042002: 17 filings (8.81/100 renter HHs)2003: 20 filings (10.36/100 renter HHs)2004: 20 filings (10.36/100 renter HHs)2005: 30 filings (21.58/100 renter HHs)2006: 31 filings (22.30/100 renter HHs)2007: 32 filings (23.02/100 renter HHs)2008: 38 filings (27.34/100 renter HHs)2009: 40 filings (28.78/100 renter HHs)2010: 23 filings (8.10/100 renter HHs)2011: 29 filings (8.61/100 renter HHs)2012: 32 filings (9.50/100 renter HHs)2013: 27 filings (8.01/100 renter HHs)2014: 38 filings (11.28/100 renter HHs)2015: 37 filings (10.98/100 renter HHs)2016: 32 filings (5.36/100 renter HHs)2018: 32 filings (5.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 88% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 237Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.27×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (2.73× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (3.18× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (2.27× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (2.69× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (2.27× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (2.27× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.76× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.92× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (3.18× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (2.14× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (2.27× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (1.79× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Skyline Acres. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Skyline Acres

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mount Healthy, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 478 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 13.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 28.8% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061021604

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061021604?

Census tract 39061021604 in the Skyline Acres neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061021604?

Median gross rent is $1,267/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061021604?

9.0% of residents in tract 39061021604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,961.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061021604?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 97th, minority 77th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 39061021604 considered part of Skyline Acres?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061021604 fall within Skyline Acres (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061021604?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 478 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061021604 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.73% of renter households, peaking at 28.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061021604 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.27× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061021604 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061021604 compare to Mount Healthy overall?

Tract 39061021604 scores 3.1/10, higher than the parent city of Mount Healthy at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Healthy; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mount Healthy

Top eight tracts in Mount Healthy ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related