Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Northern Lights District Eviction Risk: Lower , Sharonville

Tract 39061023001 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,440 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 39061023001 sits in the Northern Lights District area of Sharonville, Ohio eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. On the national scale it ranks #33,764 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,162 monthly, set against $52,158 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 42% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,612
Renter share71.7%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$52,158

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Northern Lights District
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Sharonville
Very High
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#149 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#2,004 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sharonville and the region

Centroid at 39.2844, -84.4225 · click any tract to drill in

Why Northern Lights District scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sharonville
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,162 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sharonville
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sharonville
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sharonville
4.6

How Northern Lights District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Northern Lights District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 023001Sharonville: 2.42.4Sharonvilleparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,172Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.0%Peak (2008)
  • 39Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610230012002: 44 filings (3.42/100 renter HHs)2003: 67 filings (5.21/100 renter HHs)2004: 90 filings (6.99/100 renter HHs)2005: 107 filings (8.02/100 renter HHs)2006: 119 filings (8.92/100 renter HHs)2007: 101 filings (7.57/100 renter HHs)2008: 200 filings (14.99/100 renter HHs)2009: 69 filings (5.17/100 renter HHs)2010: 74 filings (5.38/100 renter HHs)2011: 75 filings (5.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 55 filings (3.79/100 renter HHs)2013: 33 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 37 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2015: 28 filings (1.93/100 renter HHs)2016: 34 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2018: 39 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 552Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.91×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-08-01: 6 filings (1.58× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2020-10-01: 6 filings (1.76× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (1.59× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (1.74× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.79× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-10-01: 9 filings (2.65× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.19× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (2.08× baseline)2022-04-01: 14 filings (3.18× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.52× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-08-01: 20 filings (5.26× baseline)2022-09-01: 14 filings (2.69× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (2.06× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2023-01-01: 14 filings (3.18× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (2.92× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 9 filings (1.96× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (2.89× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (2.31× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (3.24× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (2.12× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (2.14× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 17 filings (3.86× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (1.74× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 19 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (2.94× baseline)2024-11-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 11 filings (2.12× baseline)2025-01-01: 12 filings (2.73× baseline)2025-02-01: 11 filings (2.62× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (2.92× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.52× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (2.22× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (1.84× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 24 filings (4.62× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Northern Lights District

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sharonville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.91x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061023001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061023001?

Census tract 39061023001 in the Northern Lights District neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061023001?

Median gross rent is $1,162/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061023001?

5.5% of residents in tract 39061023001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,440.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061023001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 70th, minority 55th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 39061023001 considered part of Northern Lights District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061023001 fall within Northern Lights District (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061023001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,172 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061023001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.40% of renter households, peaking at 15.0% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061023001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.91× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061023001 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061023001 compare to Sharonville overall?

Tract 39061023001 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Sharonville at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sharonville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sharonville

Top eight tracts in Sharonville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related