Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

Claiborne Eviction Risk: Lower , Loveland

Tract 39061024303 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,785 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 39061024303 covers Claiborne in Loveland, home to 6,785 residents. For landlords it grades 5.2/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 45th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,135 monthly, set against $90,369 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 14% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,569
Renter share24.1%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$90,369

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Claiborne
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Loveland
Very High
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#176 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,406 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Loveland and the region

Centroid at 39.2707, -84.2802 · click any tract to drill in

Why Claiborne scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Loveland
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,135 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Loveland
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Loveland
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Loveland
4.4

How Claiborne compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Claiborne risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 024303Loveland: 2.32.3Lovelandparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 738Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 7.22%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.5%Peak (2006)
  • 39Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610243032002: 50 filings (7.43/100 renter HHs)2003: 48 filings (7.13/100 renter HHs)2004: 57 filings (8.47/100 renter HHs)2005: 44 filings (8.73/100 renter HHs)2006: 73 filings (14.48/100 renter HHs)2007: 43 filings (8.53/100 renter HHs)2008: 48 filings (9.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 35 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)2010: 27 filings (3.56/100 renter HHs)2011: 55 filings (7.60/100 renter HHs)2012: 46 filings (6.35/100 renter HHs)2013: 30 filings (4.14/100 renter HHs)2014: 44 filings (6.08/100 renter HHs)2015: 60 filings (8.29/100 renter HHs)2016: 39 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)2018: 39 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 22% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 225Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.93×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.91× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 8 filings (2.35× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (2.69× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2024-05-01: 10 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.93× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Claiborne

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Loveland, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 20th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 738 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 7.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 14.5% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061024303

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061024303?

Census tract 39061024303 in the Claiborne neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061024303?

Median gross rent is $1,135/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061024303?

8.9% of residents in tract 39061024303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,785.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061024303?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 29th, minority 24th, housing 37th.
Q5

Is tract 39061024303 considered part of Claiborne?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061024303 fall within Claiborne (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061024303?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 738 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061024303 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.22% of renter households, peaking at 14.5% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061024303 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.93× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061024303 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061024303 compare to Loveland overall?

Tract 39061024303 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Loveland at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Loveland; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Loveland

Top eight tracts in Loveland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related