Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Glen Abbey Eviction Risk: Lower , Forestville
Tract 39061025103 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,668 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 39061025103 sits in the Glen Abbey area of Forestville, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. 40% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units3,003
Renter share34.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$94,453
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
22
th percentile
Low
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Forestville and the region
Centroid at 39.0654, -84.3370 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glen Abbey scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Forestville
3.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,701 rent vs county FMR
8.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forestville
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forestville
7.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forestville
5.7
How Glen Abbey compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 58%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 221Total filings over 16 yrs
- 1.93%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.2%Peak (2009)
- 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 57Total filings 2020-21
- 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.68×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.0%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 4.4%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glen Abbey
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 32.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Cost burden runs 52% here against 42.5% across Hamilton County.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.2/10.
Against the Hamilton County average of 4.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points. Food insecurity runs 7.0% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 221 filings here across 16 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2009, when 3.2% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061025103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025103?
Census tract 39061025103 in the Glen Abbey neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39061025103?
Median gross rent is $1,701/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025103?
3.7% of residents in tract 39061025103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,668.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 60th, minority 18th, housing 58th.
Q5
Is tract 39061025103 considered part of Glen Abbey?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025103 fall within Glen Abbey (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 221 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.93% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 39061025103 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.68× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 39061025103 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 39061025103 compare to Forestville overall?
Tract 39061025103 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Forestville at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forestville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related