Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Glen Abbey Eviction Risk: Lower , Forestville

Tract 39061025103 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,668 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Eviction risk in Glen Abbey in Forestville centers on tract 39061025103, which scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 6,668 residents. That is riskier than roughly 71% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,701 a month while the average household earns $94,453 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 16% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units3,003
Renter share34.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$94,453

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Glen Abbey
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Forestville
Moderate
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#191 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,766 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forestville and the region

Centroid at 39.0654, -84.3370 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glen Abbey scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forestville
3.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,701 rent vs county FMR
8.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forestville
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forestville
7.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forestville
5.7

How Glen Abbey compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glen Abbey risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 025103Forestville: 2.42.4Forestvilleparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 221Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 1.93%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.2%Peak (2009)
  • 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610251032002: 7 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)2003: 10 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2004: 10 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2005: 18 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2006: 9 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2007: 16 filings (2.33/100 renter HHs)2008: 17 filings (2.47/100 renter HHs)2009: 22 filings (3.20/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2011: 16 filings (2.04/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (2.29/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 20 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2015: 12 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2016: 12 filings (1.57/100 renter HHs)2018: 6 filings (0.79/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 57Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.68×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (6.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glen Abbey

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forestville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.68x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025103?

Census tract 39061025103 in the Glen Abbey neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025103?

Median gross rent is $1,701/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025103?

3.7% of residents in tract 39061025103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,668.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 60th, minority 18th, housing 58th.
Q5

Is tract 39061025103 considered part of Glen Abbey?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025103 fall within Glen Abbey (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 221 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.93% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025103 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.68× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061025103 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061025103 compare to Forestville overall?

Tract 39061025103 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Forestville at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forestville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related