Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Pataskala Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39089756801 · Licking County, OH · pop 4,325 · 71% of tract blocks fall in Pataskala
With a score of 3.6/10, tract 39089756801 in Pataskala, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs about one in five here against 37.9% across Licking County.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 47%
Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units1,761
Renter share59.2%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$87,749
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
44
th percentile
Moderate
National
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pataskala and the region
Centroid at 39.9909, -82.6645 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pataskala scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pataskala
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,413 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pataskala
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pataskala
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pataskala
4.1
How Pataskala compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 33%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.2%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.7%Food insecurity
- 11.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.6%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 30.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pataskala
The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 2.1/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.5/10.
Nationally it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.5/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Licking County average of 3.9 closely. Average gross rent is $1,413, close to the Pataskala average. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $87,749.
59% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 39089756801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39089756801?
Census tract 39089756801 in Pataskala scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39089756801?
Median gross rent is $1,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39089756801?
10.1% of residents in tract 39089756801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,325.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39089756801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 88th, minority 33th, housing 78th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 39089756801 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 39089756801 compare to Pataskala overall?
Tract 39089756801 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Pataskala at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pataskala; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pataskala
Top eight tracts in Pataskala ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related