Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 39113080200 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39113080200 · Montgomery County, OH · pop 2,305

With a score of 3.9/10, tract 39113080200 in Montgomery County, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Against Montgomery County at 42.9%, 91% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 1% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,200
Renter share9.0%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$76,382

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In city
Very Low
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 156 tracts In Montgomery County
Moderate
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#1,558 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
National
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#50,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Montgomery County and the region

Centroid at 39.8259, -84.2332 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 39113080200 scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,008 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 39113080200 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 39113080200 risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.9This tracttract 0802004.2Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 487Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 14.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.9%Peak (2014)
  • 13Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39113080200
Filings dropped 68% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 39113080200

20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 7.7/10.

Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Well under the midpoint, local political climate reads 2.4/10. The filing record is not thin: 487 evictions over 17 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2014 at 16.9% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 14.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.5/10. Against average income of $76,382, annual rent is just 16%.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 39113080200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39113080200?

Census tract 39113080200 in Montgomery County scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39113080200?

Median gross rent is $1,008/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 91% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39113080200?

16.7% of residents in tract 39113080200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,305.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39113080200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 85th, minority 68th, housing 15th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39113080200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 487 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39113080200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.36% of renter households, peaking at 16.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 39113080200 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

Was tract 39113080200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related