Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 39113080200 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39113080200 ·
Montgomery County, OH · pop 2,305
Here is how census tract 39113080200, in Montgomery, looks to a landlord: a 5.5/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 2,305. It lands near the 56th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 91% of renter households, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,008 a month against an average household income of $76,382 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 1%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,200
Renter share9.0%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$76,382
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0th percentile
#3 of 3 tracts In city
Very Low
Within county
49th percentile
#80 of 156 tracts In Montgomery County
Moderate
Within state
52th percentile
#1,513 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
National
43th percentile
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Montgomery County and the region
Centroid at 39.8259, -84.2332 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 39113080200 scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,008 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 39113080200 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
51%Socioeconomic
85%Household composition
68%Racial/ethnic minority
15%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
3%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.2%Housing insecurity
10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
15.5%Food insecurity
13.6%SNAP enrollment
8.6%Transit barriers
6.9%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
31.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 39113080200
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Ohio eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Montgomery County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39113080200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39113080200?
Census tract 39113080200 in Montgomery County scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39113080200?
Median gross rent is $1,008/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 91% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39113080200?
16.7% of residents in tract 39113080200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,305.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39113080200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 85th, minority 68th, housing 15th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39113080200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 487 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39113080200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.36% of renter households, peaking at 16.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39113080200 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
Was tract 39113080200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.