Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Alliance Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 39151710400 · Stark County, OH · pop 921

39151710400 is a census tract in Alliance, OH. It scores 5.4/10 for landlords. It is home to 921 residents. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 62% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units474
Renter share92.6%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate45.4%
Median income$17,727

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 8 tracts In Alliance
Elevated
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#17 of 90 tracts In Stark County
High
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#554 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
National
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#24,859 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alliance and the region

Centroid at 40.9198, -81.1011 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alliance scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alliance
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
45.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$564 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alliance
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alliance
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alliance
6.1

How Alliance compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alliance risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 7104004.0Allianceparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 560Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 8.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.7%Peak (2015)
  • 36Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39151710400
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alliance

SNAP participation runs 43.0% against 15.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 45%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

93% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Food insecurity runs 38.1% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.2/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $17,727 and the ratio lands at 38%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. At $564 a month, rents run 33% under what the rest of Alliance commands.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

It sits 1.3 points above the Stark County average of 4.1. Against Stark County at 38.2%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 560 evictions over 15 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2015 at 12.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 8.2% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.9/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 39151710400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39151710400?

Census tract 39151710400 in Alliance scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39151710400?

Median gross rent is $564/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39151710400?

45.4% of residents in tract 39151710400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 921.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39151710400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 45th, minority 50th, housing 95th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39151710400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 560 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39151710400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.25% of renter households, peaking at 12.7% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 39151710400 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39151710400 compare to Alliance overall?

Tract 39151710400 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Alliance at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alliance; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Alliance

Top eight tracts in Alliance ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related