Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

The Kames Eviction Risk: Lower , Stow

Tract 39153530603 · Summit County, OH · pop 4,630 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

How risky is The Kames in Stow for landlords? Census tract 39153530603 scores 5.8/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 67th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,268 monthly, set against $70,302 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 60% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 27% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,165
Renter share60.3%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$70,302

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In The Kames
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 tracts In Stow
Very High
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 138 tracts In Summit County
Moderate
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#1,737 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Stow and the region

Centroid at 41.1920, -81.4703 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Kames scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stow
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,268 rent vs county FMR
6.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stow
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stow
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stow
4.5

How The Kames compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Kames risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 530603Stow: 2.42.4Stowparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 624Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 3.62%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.8%Peak (2003)
  • 35Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 391535306032002: 38 filings (6.41/100 renter HHs)2003: 64 filings (10.79/100 renter HHs)2004: 36 filings (6.07/100 renter HHs)2005: 31 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)2006: 50 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 57 filings (4.56/100 renter HHs)2008: 29 filings (2.32/100 renter HHs)2009: 29 filings (2.32/100 renter HHs)2010: 32 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2011: 34 filings (2.71/100 renter HHs)2012: 31 filings (2.47/100 renter HHs)2013: 28 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2014: 36 filings (2.87/100 renter HHs)2015: 25 filings (1.99/100 renter HHs)2016: 34 filings (2.54/100 renter HHs)2017: 35 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2018: 35 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Kames. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Kames

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Stow eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Summit County average of 5.2 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 52nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 624 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 3.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.8% of renter households in 2003.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39153530603

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153530603?

Census tract 39153530603 in the The Kames neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39153530603?

Median gross rent is $1,268/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39153530603?

15.0% of residents in tract 39153530603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,630.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39153530603?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 22th, minority 28th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 39153530603 considered part of The Kames?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153530603 fall within The Kames (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153530603?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 624 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153530603 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.62% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39153530603 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39153530603 compare to Stow overall?

Tract 39153530603 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Stow at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stow eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 39153530603 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Stow

Top eight tracts in Stow ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related