Census Tract · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Langston Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 40083600600 ·
Logan County, OK · pop 4,851 · 29% of tract blocks fall in Langston
Census tract 40083600600 covers part of Langston, OK, and scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,851. At $779 a month, rents run 68% over what the rest of Langston commands.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 13%Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share17.4%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate18.9%
Median income$71,779
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Langston
Moderate
Within county
75th percentile
#4 of 13 tracts In Logan County
High
Within state
92th percentile
#100 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Very High
National
58th percentile
#35,669 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Langston and the region
Centroid at 35.8488, -97.2372 · click any tract to drill in
Why Langston scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Langston
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.6
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.9% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$779 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Langston
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Langston
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Langston
7.4
How Langston compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
16.7%Housing insecurity
12.4%Utility-shutoff threat
22.6%Food insecurity
18.7%SNAP enrollment
13.1%Transit barriers
9.4%No health insurance
21.0%Frequent mental distress
39.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Langston
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.
The severe-burden share is 15%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against Logan County at 32.0%, 26% of renters here are cost-burdened. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
It sits 0.8 points above the Logan County average of 4.0. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.8/10. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $71,779, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the OK average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 40083600600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40083600600?
Census tract 40083600600 in Langston scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40083600600?
Median gross rent is $779/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40083600600?
18.9% of residents in tract 40083600600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,851.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40083600600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 38th, minority 60th, housing 80th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40083600600 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40083600600 compare to Langston overall?
Tract 40083600600 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Langston at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Langston; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.