Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #45,786 of 84,120 nationally

Deco District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Tract 40143002500 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 4,161 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Tract 40143002500 sits in the Deco District area of Tulsa eviction risk, OK, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.2/10. Population here is 4,161. This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 62% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,944
Renter share91.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate19.9%
Median income$64,861

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Deco District
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Moderate
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#74 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
Elevated
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#388 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1524, -95.9907 · click any tract to drill in

Why Deco District scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
19.9% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,303 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Deco District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Deco District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 002500Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Deco District

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. At $1,303 a month, rents run 24% over what the rest of Tulsa commands.

Against Tulsa County at 40.3%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #45,786 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 7.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Tulsa County average of 3.7 closely.

Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $64,861.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143002500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143002500?

Census tract 40143002500 in the Deco District neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143002500?

Median gross rent is $1,303/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143002500?

19.9% of residents in tract 40143002500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,161.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143002500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 10th, minority 56th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 40143002500 considered part of Deco District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143002500 fall within Deco District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143002500 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143002500 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143002500 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143002500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 14% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related