Yorktown Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running cool, economic stress reads 2.2/10. Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally.

At $1,224 a month, rents run 16% over what the rest of Tulsa commands. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.2/10.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $79,474.

53% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.