Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally

Mingo Valley Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Tract 40143007102 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,538 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 40143007102 covers part of the Mingo Valley area of Tulsa, OK, and scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,538. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 38% Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units1,055
Renter share66.4%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate20.9%
Median income$43,651

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Mingo Valley
Moderate
Within parent city
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Elevated
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#100 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1392, -95.8729 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mingo Valley scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
20.9% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$832 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Mingo Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mingo Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 007102Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mingo Valley

26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Food insecurity runs 33.9% against 17.8% nationally.

66% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.1/10.

Average gross rent is $832, 21% below the Tulsa average. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.

Adults with no health insurance runs 19.6% against 11.3% nationally. Nationally it ranks #35,669 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the OK average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. 43% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143007102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143007102?

Census tract 40143007102 in the Mingo Valley neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143007102?

Median gross rent is $832/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143007102?

20.9% of residents in tract 40143007102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,538.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143007102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 94th, minority 71th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 40143007102 considered part of Mingo Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143007102 fall within Mingo Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143007102 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143007102 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143007102 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related