Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Forest Trails Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa
Tract 40143007636 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 4,492 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
The Lower-tier score of 3.7/10 for census tract 40143007636 reflects conditions in Forest Trails in Tulsa, Oklahoma. That is riskier than about 7% of US census tracts.
About 37% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,086 monthly, set against $112,031 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 29% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,785
Renter share28.9%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$112,031
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
9
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tulsa and the region
Centroid at 36.0028, -95.8955 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forest Trails scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,086 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5
How Forest Trails compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 43%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.7%Housing insecurity
- 5.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.7%Food insecurity
- 6.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 6.3%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 30.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Forest Trails
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Tulsa County average of 4.1 and below the Oklahoma statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 29th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 40143007636
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143007636?
Census tract 40143007636 in the Forest Trails neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40143007636?
Median gross rent is $1,086/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40143007636?
4.8% of residents in tract 40143007636 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,492.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40143007636?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 43th, minority 34th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 40143007636 considered part of Forest Trails?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143007636 fall within Forest Trails (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 40143007636 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 40143007636 compare to Tulsa overall?
Tract 40143007636 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Tulsa at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa
Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OK
Renaissance
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Lakeview Heights
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Pearl District
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Walt Whitman
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Springdale
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Woodrow Park
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Maxwell
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · OK
Quail Ridge
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related