High Field Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

At $2,413 a month, rents run 129% over what the rest of Tulsa commands. The voucher gap is 104.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. 31% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. SNAP participation runs 4.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Housing insecurity runs 6.3% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $190,197, annual rent is just 15%. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.