High Field Eviction Risk: Lower

What pushes the score up most is supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 104.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10.

Running cool is economic stress, at 1/10. Rent consumes at least 30% of income for around a third of renter households. The severe-burden share is 12%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Food insecurity affects 6.7% of adults, 11.1 points below the national rate. 4.9% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt.

Among the 117 mapped neighborhoods of Tulsa, it ranks #88 by risk, the lower third. At 6% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.

Against average income of $190,197, annual rent is only 15%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.