Tradition Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. Against Tulsa County at 40.3%, 30% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Food insecurity runs 6.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 4.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 2% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.