Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Foots Creek Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 41029003001 · Jackson County, OR · pop 4,065 · 8% of tract blocks fall in Foots Creek

How risky is Foots Creek for landlords? Census tract 41029003001 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #43,263 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,055 monthly, set against $69,826 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 19% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 12% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,669
Renter share18.7%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate10.6%
Median income$69,826

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Foots Creek
Moderate
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 52 tracts In Jackson County
Very Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#787 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Low
National
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#51,553 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foots Creek and the region

Centroid at 42.3380, -123.0845 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foots Creek scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foots Creek
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
10.6% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,055 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foots Creek
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foots Creek
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foots Creek
4.6

How Foots Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foots Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 003001Foots Creek: 5.85.8Foots Creekparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 193Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 4.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.6%Peak (2010)
  • 19Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410290030012000: 8 filings (2.96/100 renter HHs)2001: 9 filings (3.33/100 renter HHs)2003: 13 filings (4.81/100 renter HHs)2004: 11 filings (4.07/100 renter HHs)2005: 13 filings (3.09/100 renter HHs)2006: 17 filings (4.04/100 renter HHs)2007: 15 filings (3.56/100 renter HHs)2008: 14 filings (3.33/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2010: 20 filings (6.64/100 renter HHs)2011: 9 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (6.38/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (5.67/100 renter HHs)2016: 19 filings (6.31/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 138% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 75Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked South Bend, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foots Creek

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foots Creek, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jackson County average of 6.1 and below the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 193 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 4.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.6% of renter households in 2010.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 43rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 41029003001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41029003001?

Census tract 41029003001 in Foots Creek scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41029003001?

Median gross rent is $1,055/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41029003001?

10.6% of residents in tract 41029003001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,065.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41029003001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 60th, minority 19th, housing 31th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41029003001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 193 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 41029003001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.29% of renter households, peaking at 6.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41029003001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (South Bend eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41029003001 compare to Foots Creek overall?

Tract 41029003001 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Foots Creek at 5.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foots Creek; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related