Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 41035970100 · Klamath County, OR · pop 3,486 · 1% of tract blocks fall in Crescent Lake

Census tract 41035970100 covers part of Crescent Lake, OR, and scores 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,486. Against Klamath County at 43.7%, roughly one in eight of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 9% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,500
Renter share9.8%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate17.1%
Median income$58,182

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crescent Lake
Moderate
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 22 tracts In Klamath County
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#690 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Low
National
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#28,095 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crescent Lake and the region

Centroid at 43.2691, -121.7829 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Lake scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crescent Lake
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
17.1% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$831 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crescent Lake
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crescent Lake
9.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crescent Lake
4.3

How Crescent Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.3This tracttract 9701005.3Crescent Lakeparent city6.0Countyavg tract in county6.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 23Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.0%Peak (2016)
  • 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 41035970100
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 38Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked South Bend, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Lake

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.8/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.5/10.

Running hot, state political climate reads 7.2/10. The filing record is not thin: 23 evictions over 5 years of observation. It sits 0.7 points below the Klamath County average of 6.0.

Filings peaked in 2016 at 2.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.3% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 67th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $58,182, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 41035970100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41035970100?

Census tract 41035970100 in Crescent Lake scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41035970100?

Median gross rent is $831/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41035970100?

17.1% of residents in tract 41035970100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,486.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41035970100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 30th, minority 4th, housing 68th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41035970100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 23 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 41035970100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.35% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41035970100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (South Bend eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41035970100 compare to Crescent Lake overall?

Tract 41035970100 scores 5.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Crescent Lake at 5.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crescent Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related