Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Veneta Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 41039000903 · Lane County, OR · pop 5,385 · 42% of tract blocks fall in Veneta

Tract 41039000903, home to 5,385 residents in Veneta, scores 6.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 88th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

81% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,481 monthly, set against $62,786 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 4% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,502
Renter share20.2%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$62,786

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Veneta
Very High
Within county
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#71 of 92 tracts In Lane County
Low
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#495 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Moderate
National
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#29,578 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Veneta and the region

Centroid at 44.0440, -123.3019 · click any tract to drill in

Why Veneta scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Veneta
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,481 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Veneta
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Veneta
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Veneta
6.9

How Veneta compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Veneta risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 000903Veneta: 7.17.1Venetaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 182Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 3.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.8%Peak (2014)
  • 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410390009032000: 10 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2001: 10 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2002: 13 filings (6.22/100 renter HHs)2003: 12 filings (5.74/100 renter HHs)2004: 9 filings (4.31/100 renter HHs)2005: 14 filings (3.41/100 renter HHs)2006: 15 filings (3.65/100 renter HHs)2007: 17 filings (4.14/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (1.46/100 renter HHs)2009: 13 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2010: 8 filings (2.27/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2013: 9 filings (2.39/100 renter HHs)2014: 22 filings (5.84/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 51Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Eugene, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Veneta

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Veneta, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Lane County average of 6.1 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 59th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 182 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 3.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.8% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41039000903

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41039000903?

Census tract 41039000903 in Veneta scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41039000903?

Median gross rent is $1,481/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 81% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41039000903?

19.6% of residents in tract 41039000903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,385.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41039000903?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 75th, minority 44th, housing 32th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41039000903?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 182 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41039000903 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.65% of renter households, peaking at 5.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41039000903 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Eugene eviction risk, OR), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41039000903 compare to Veneta overall?

Tract 41039000903 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Veneta at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Veneta; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Veneta

Top eight tracts in Veneta ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related