Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally
North Central Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gresham
Tract 41051010304 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 5,051 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 41051010304 covers the North Central neighborhood of Gresham, home to 5,051 residents. For landlords it grades 6.5/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,390 a month while the average household earns $67,970 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 50% of occupied homes.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,813
Renter share49.7%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate22.8%
Median income$67,970
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
66
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
75
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gresham and the region
Centroid at 45.5345, -122.4241 · click any tract to drill in
Why North Central scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gresham
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
22.8% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,390 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gresham
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gresham
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gresham
4.8
How North Central compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 835Total filings over 16 yrs
- 7.51%Avg annual filing rate
- 13.7%Peak (2000)
- 27Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 69% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 209Total filings 2020-21
- 2.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 4.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.65×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North Central. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in North Central
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Gresham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 835 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 7.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.7% of renter households in 2000.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051010304
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051010304?
Census tract 41051010304 in the North Central neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051010304?
Median gross rent is $1,390/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051010304?
22.8% of residents in tract 41051010304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,051.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051010304?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 97th, minority 76th, housing 100th.
Q5
Is tract 41051010304 considered part of North Central?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051010304 fall within North Central (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051010304?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 835 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051010304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.51% of renter households, peaking at 13.7% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051010304 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.65× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051010304 compare to Gresham overall?
Tract 41051010304 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Gresham at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gresham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related